• 山西省纪委监委公开曝光5起违反中央八项规定精神问题 2019-03-09
  • An advance booking of two hours can be made for Yangtze River Cableway tickets - Chongqing News - CQNEWS 2019-03-04
  • 天津大学与南昌——校地联手促产业升级 2019-02-22
  • 【十九大·理论新视野】为什么要“建设现代化经济体系”?   2018-11-22
  • 清华大学全球私募股权研究院举办PE夏季论坛 2018-11-22
  • 黑龙江:2017年6500名大学生入伍 2018-11-21
  • 清明祭英烈:90后抗洪英烈曹志宇、王岩松生前影像曝光 2018-11-20
  • 广东11选5刷水方案:广东11选5任三计划


    广东11选5任三计划 www.sxva.net Why Apple failed in India — and how it can start innovating again




    The iPhone maker could use India, the world’s fastest-growing market, as a test bed for experimental technologies


    Apple’s iPhone sales in India are expected to have fallen dramatically this year to two million, from three million phones last year.


    Reuters reports that at the peak shopping season, in Diwali, Apple stores were deserted. This occurred in the world’s fastest-growing market, in which smartphone sales are often increasing by more than 20% every quarter.


    Yet Apple’s loss of the Indian market was entirely predictable. In a Washington Post column of March 2017, I described Apple’s repetition in India of the mistakes it made in China: Relying entirely on its brand recognition to build a market for its products there. Rather than attempt to understand the needs of its customers, Apple made insulting plans to market older and inferior versions of iPhones to its Indian customers — and lost their loyalty.


    IPhone isn’t special


    The iPhone no longer stands out as it once did from its competition. Chinese and domestic smartphones boasting capabilities similar to those of the iPhone are now available for a fraction of the iPhone’s cost. Samsung’s SSNLF, -3.07%  high-end phones have far more advanced features. And, with practically no brand recognition by the hundreds of millions of Indians who are buying their first devices, Apple does not have any form of product lock-in as it does with Western consumers who have owned other Apple products and are now buying smartphones. Apple also made no real attempt to customize its phones or applications to address the needs of Indian consumers; they are the same as in the United States. Siri struggles no less on an Indian iPhone than on a U.S. one to recognize an Indian name or city or to play Bollywood tunes.


    It wasn’t even their technical superiority that made the earlier iPhones so appealing to the well-to-do in India; it was the status and accompanying social gratification they offered. There is no gratification in buying a product that is clearly inferior. Indian consumers who can afford iPhones want the latest and greatest, not hand-me-downs.


    So Apple could hardly have botched its entry into the Indian market more perfectly.



    Pursuit of perfection


    And it’s not just Apple’s global distribution and marketing strategy that needs an overhaul. The company needs to rethink the way it innovates. Its pursuit of perfection is out of touch with the times.


    The way in which innovation happens now is that you release a basic product and let the market tell you how to make it better. Google, Facebook, Tesla and tens of thousands of startup companies are always releasing what are called minimum viable products, functional prototypes with the most basic of features. The idea is to get something out as quickly as possible and learn from customer feedback. That is because in the fast-moving technology world, there is no time to get a product perfect; the perfected product may become obsolete even before it is released.


    Apple hasn’t figured that out yet. It maintains a fortress of secrecy, and its leaders dictate product features. When it releases a new technology, it goes to extremes to ensure elegant design and perfection. Steve Jobs was a true visionary who refused to listen to customers — believing that he knew better than they did about what they needed. He ruled with an iron fist and did not tolerate dissension. And people in one Apple division never knew what others in the company were developing; that’s the kind of secrecy the company maintained.


    Jobs’s tactics worked very well for him, and he created the most valuable company in the world. But, since those days, technological change has accelerated and cheaper alternatives have become available from all around the globe.


    More experimentation


    Apple’s last major innovation, the iPhone, was released in 2007. Since then, Apple has been tweaking that device’s componentry, adding faster processors and more-advanced sensors, and releasing it in larger and smaller form factors — as with the iPad and Apple Watch. Even Apple’s most recent announcements were uninspiring: yes, yet more smaller and larger iPhones, iPads and watches.

    苹果最后一次重大创新是2007年发布的iPhone。从那以后,苹果一直在调整设备的组件,增加了更快的处理器和更先进的传感器,并发布不同大小的产品,比如iPad和Apple Watch。就连苹果最近发布的产品也令人沮丧,更多大大小小的iphone、ipad和Apple Watch。

    There is a way in which Apple could use India’s market to its advantage: to make it a test bed for its experimental technologies. No doubt Apple has a trove of products that need market validation and that are not yet perfect, such as TV sets, virtual-reality headsets and new types of medical devices. India provides a massive market that will lap up the innovations and provide critical advice. Apple could develop these products in Indian languages so that they aren’t usable back at home, and price them for affordability to their Indian customers.


    To the visionaries who once guided Apple, experimenting with new ideas in new markets would have been an obvious possibility to explore. Taking instead the unimaginative option of dumping leftovers on a prime market suggests that Apple’s present leaders have let their imaginations wither on the vine.



    译文来源:三泰虎 //www.sxva.net/46495.html   译者:Jessica.Wu


    Eurythmic_Starship14 hours ago

    Deli citizens prefer Samsung, LG, etc than Apple phone.



    AP13 hours ago

    When has Apple been innovative? Apple's core competency is in user interface. Even iPhone was more of a repackaging of existing technologies with nice UI.



    $everyoung7 hours ago

    Over price sure has something to do with it.



    Denis9 hours ago

    Indians are smart not to pay over-priced iPhone when there is an alternative. Huawei is very popular smart phone in India for its high-quality and reasonable price.



    LOVE ONE AMERICA13 hours ago

    Samsung make in India take greater Advantage Tech support from India make more powerful cell phone. Samsung CEO said if we come 5 years early we can make better phone by india technology China Apple thieves privacy of people Indian people smart not to buy China Apple product



    Denali12 hours ago

    Because they want free stuff in India



    david1 hour ago

    They barely have enough to eat how can they afford Apple phone.



    ninja black12 hours ago

    Can’t help it if they don’t know good tech. Reliability is key along with having an idea on how to use the tech effectively.



    Robert8 hours ago

    summary: Tim Cook is not Steve Jobs.



    Man Kong12 hours ago

    When a Chinese buys, he thinks thrice after reviewing full details of the quality and price. She will account it twice. When an Indian buys, he will probably review the whole thing thoroughly for 10 times.



    Jim12 hours ago

    Indians are too poor to afford to apple products.


    三泰虎原创译文,禁止转载?。?a href="//www.sxva.net/">首页 > 美国 » 苹果为何会在印度失败


  • 山西省纪委监委公开曝光5起违反中央八项规定精神问题 2019-03-09
  • An advance booking of two hours can be made for Yangtze River Cableway tickets - Chongqing News - CQNEWS 2019-03-04
  • 天津大学与南昌——校地联手促产业升级 2019-02-22
  • 【十九大·理论新视野】为什么要“建设现代化经济体系”?   2018-11-22
  • 清华大学全球私募股权研究院举办PE夏季论坛 2018-11-22
  • 黑龙江:2017年6500名大学生入伍 2018-11-21
  • 清明祭英烈:90后抗洪英烈曹志宇、王岩松生前影像曝光 2018-11-20